Kuhn is not quite as influential in the Philosophy of Science as he was expected to be in the 70's and 80's when it seemed 'paradigm this' and 'paradigm that' were the words of the day. I'd say Popper holds greater sway in the actual working scientist's game plan. Also, in his later years, Kuhn changed his mind about some of the points in Structure.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/


---

The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth. - Niels Bohr