Originally Posted By: joemikeb
...I have to wonder if he is not hoping to at least create a constitutional crises if he loses.

He could, indeed, and it looks like he intends to, cause a Constitutional crisis by challenging the results in close states...that on top of his apparently forthcoming refusal to concede to Hillary should she win. (Or he could cause an entirely different kind of Constitutional crisis if his efforts to prevent people from voting result in Hillary's challenging the results in specific districts, if not entire states.)

But crisis or not, if he refuses to concede if Hillary wins she'll be a VERY embattled President and America will be a VERY divided country from day one.

And that first "if" should probably be read as "when".

Edit: Y'know, I'll amend that by saying that his intentions may not be malevolent as they appear to be...that he and everything he says and does may simply be "innocent" byproducts of his egomaniacal inability to ever admit that he's been wrong...or lost.

Last edited by artie505; 10/14/16 11:39 PM.
The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire