Originally Posted By: artie505
Originally Posted By: jchuzi
They should be equal in terms of recovering data but cloning back is probably faster. That's the way I would go (and I have done it a few times).

I seem to have better success with preservation of data when I nuke, pave, and migrate than when I restore from a clone.

Do you have any experience in that regard?
No, I have never done it.

Jon

macOS 11.7.10, iMac Retina 5K 27-inch, late 2014, 3.5 GHz Intel Core i5, 1 TB fusion drive, 16 GB RAM, Epson SureColor P600, Photoshop CC, Lightroom CC, MS Office 365