> But to return to my original post, that was phrased as a question. In that and subsequent posts I didn't so much state that Apple had indeed abandoned Snowy, but suggested that we're inching closer to that. I still think that's the best way to interpret the current situation.
I linked to Cohen in response to your question (but I'll debunk his argument that Apple is still selling Snowy by again pointing out that it's probably for the benefit of Leopard and earlier users who must install it to get to the App Store before they can upgrade past it).
As for "inching closer", perhaps, but I think support should be all or nothing, not maybe, and only Apple is qualified to say either "yes" or "no".
