Your own post argues against "specious" being a correct description of my argument!

I've never attempted to estimate a percentage of viewers who may either benefit from expanded forum indices or simply find them useful, merely argued that there is such a percentage, and your post supports my argument...

Originally Posted By: dkmarsh
"Of the sixteen such threads I was able to load before the page refreshed, twelve were older than six months."

A coupl'a questions about visitors and referrers:

1. Can you tell with the tools at your disposal to precisely which threads visitors were referred, or can you tell no more than that they were referred by a search engine, i.e. do you know for a fact that the posts they were viewing during the moments of time in your snapshots are the specific posts to which they were referred, rather than secondary, tertiary, etc, views?

2. Can you tell the origin of viewers looking at lists of posts or the main index?

The answers to those questions will give us a better perspective on your post.

The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire