My take is the relatively long exposure time the camera requires to capture an image using IR lighting and the speed of the object creates the impression of a long body because of the distance the object travels during a single exposure. (My camera offers exposure times from 1/15 to 1/450 but the IR only provides enough light for exposure settings in the 1/15 range.) Likewise the quad wings are the top and bottom of the object's rapid wing beat where there is a brief, very brief, pause as the beat changes direction. All of this together with what has appeared to be a forked tail in previous still images and the somewhat erratic flight path which is typical of the common nighthawk informs my guess as to its nature.


If we knew what it was we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?

— Albert Einstein