An open community 
of Macintosh users,
for Macintosh users.

FineTunedMac Dashboard widget now available! Download Here

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Default Display Options
#27987 01/23/14 07:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
deniro Offline OP
OP Offline

Joined: Sep 2009
Is there a way get a forum or thread display option changed to 6 months rather than 1 month? Often when I enter a forum, there are only a few threads/messages showing, and I always want to see more from the past.

If you follow me…

I'd like to be able to have more threads appear (older threads) when I enter a forum rather than having to change it (to last 6 months, etc.) in the drop menu every time.

Keep up the good work and thanks for this forum. Very helpful for me.

Re: Default Display Options
deniro #27989 01/23/14 07:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Deleted after rereading OP. tongue

I don't see a personal pref; it would have to be a UBB pref that would affect everybody.

Last edited by artie505; 01/24/14 01:01 AM.

The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
deniro #27994 01/24/14 11:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
cyn Online
Administrator
Online
Administrator

Joined: Aug 2009
There's a setting for each forum. Wouldn't take me long to change the defaults, if that's what people want.

Anyone else have a preference?


FineTunedMac Forums Admin
Re: Default Display Options
cyn #27995 01/24/14 12:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
I'll opt for 90 days.

Thanks.


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
cyn #27996 01/24/14 04:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
No preference here. I'll go along with the majority vote.


ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Default Display Options
cyn #27997 01/24/14 05:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 8
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 8
6 months is too long. 90 days? Hmm. What's wrong with searching for anything over 30 days? What are the practical reasons for needing to see more than a month's worth?


On a Mac since 1984.
Currently: 24" M1 iMac, M2 Pro Mac mini with 27" BenQ monitor, M2 Macbook Air, MacOS 14.x; iPhones, iPods (yes, still) and iPads.
Re: Default Display Options
Ira L #28000 01/24/14 06:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Ira L
What's wrong with searching for anything over 30 days? What are the practical reasons for needing to see more than a month's worth?

At issue might be 'overview', seeing as many posts as possible with the minimum number of mouse clicks. An intermediate between looking for that 'recent' post you recall but for the exact title, and resorting to the Search function right away. But because that overview is also limited by the (user-defined) number of topics or posts displayed on a single page, a larger period displayed may still require mouse clicks, and not help much in that respect. Moreover, displaying more than the current defaults may increase page loading time. With the current posting frequency I guess 60 or perhaps 90 days might be a good compromise.


alternaut moderator
Re: Default Display Options
alternaut #28001 01/24/14 06:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
deniro Offline OP
OP Offline

Joined: Sep 2009
Let's say I click on Audio, Video, Photography. It defaults to "active during the past month" and there's only one post. Mine.

Re: Default Display Options
deniro #28002 01/24/14 06:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Yes, I know exactly what you mean. That's also why I brought up the posting frequency, which might suggest different default settings per forum, depending on their 'popularity'. You've got to weigh such customization (I don't know offhand what it entails) against the inevitable point at which you as user have to adjust your display setting.


alternaut moderator
Re: Default Display Options
alternaut #28003 01/24/14 07:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
I just went through the index, forum by forum, and found that an increase to a 180 day display increases neither the number of threads displayed nor loading time all that much with the exception of the Networking Forum, which grows from one page to two.

(Having a larger number of threads displayed in each forum index makes it look more like our reason for being here is being fulfilled [ tongue ]....may even make FTM look more attractive to potential new members.)

Edit: That said, I'll up my pref to a 180 day display for all forums other than Networking for which I'll opt for 90 days.

Last edited by artie505; 01/24/14 07:56 PM.

The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
cyn #28004 01/24/14 08:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
I'm going to have to 'vote' for "active in the last month".
Anything older than that is easy enough to check out.

Re: Default Display Options
grelber #28005 01/24/14 08:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Sounds like a 56k modem is doing your thinking for you. wink


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28006 01/24/14 09:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Good points, both yours (180 days) and Grelber's (30 days). Unfortunately, they are mutually exclusive, perhaps suggesting a 90 day (?) compromise... shocked

Last edited by alternaut; 01/24/14 09:02 PM.

alternaut moderator
Re: Default Display Options
alternaut #28007 01/24/14 09:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Since I'm guessing that grelber's problem with more than 30 days is due to a modem issue from which he, alone, may suffer, I'll stick with 180 days (90 for Networking).

My thinking is that the more new visitors see, the more likely they may be to hang around and explore, and we could really use some new visitors; FTM is starting to look like a Mac Users Group. frown

Sorry, grelber.


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28008 01/24/14 11:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Not really a (slow) modem issue.
I just find it tedious paging through dated materials.
If no one's had anything to add to a thread in 30 days, it's likely a 'dead fish'.

Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28011 01/25/14 12:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Originally Posted By: artie505
My thinking is that the more new visitors see, the more likely they may be to hang around and explore....

IMHO, this the best rationale so far.

Last edited by ryck; 01/25/14 12:13 PM.

ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Default Display Options
grelber #28013 01/26/14 09:13 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
> I just find it tedious paging through dated materials.

Paging? It's totally visual, and with the red new-post numbers highlighting what you haven't already looked at, I don't see what can be tedious.

> If no one's had anything to add to a thread in 30 days, it's likely a 'dead fish'.

As far as you're concerned.


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28014 01/26/14 10:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Yep. It's all just opinion.

Re: Default Display Options
cyn #28015 01/26/14 02:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 3
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 3

I rarely access older threads by way of individual forum indexes; that requires remembering which forum the snippet of thread I'm looking for resides in. Instead, I almost always track older references down via the Search page, so it makes no difference to my usage habits what the default time period for threads displayed in a forum index is.

I think the argument that "more threads displayed will make potential contributors more likely to stick around" is pretty specious. Speaking for myself, when a search for specialized information leads me to a forum site, my decision whether or not to utilize that site as a future resource is based entirely on my success at obtaining the information sought at the time, not on some speculation regarding potential usefulness based on quantity of old threads.

That is, if I google on a search phrase, and find useful information at Forum X, I may bookmark the site for future direct searching, especially if this isn't the first time Forum X has proven helpful. If I don't find useful info, though, I am exceedingly unlikely to peruse listings of threads to see if the site might be helpful at some future point; I just assume that if it is, I'll find it again during some subsequent googling. Life is too short to be cataloguing the thousands of search results which didn't answer my question.



dkmarsh—member, FineTunedMac Co-op Board of Directors
Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28017 01/26/14 10:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 16
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 16
Originally Posted By: artie505
My thinking is that the more new visitors see, the more likely they may be to hang around and explore, and we could really use some new visitors; FTM is starting to look like a Mac Users Group. frown

Maybe, but when I see the last post on a forum was months ago that seems a clear indication that it is a dead forum and time for me to look elsewhere.


If we knew what it was we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?

— Albert Einstein
Re: Default Display Options
joemikeb #28018 01/27/14 09:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Perhaps but, if you find the answer you were looking for, why would you look elsewhere?

When I seek answers in places other than at the FTM site, which is not often, one of the things I look for is the amount of conversation there has been on the topic. There will be different answers to the same question and the conversation usually helps determine which is reliable advice and which is not.

If I arrive at a site and the question has one answer and nothing more, that is when I look elsewhere. FTM is the only place I will trust a single answer.

Persons with greater knowledge are better equipped to separate the wheat from the chaff when they visit new sites. However, I have a more cautious approach to advice and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only person in the entire internet who likes to see some validation.

It's decidedly better than accepting bad advice only to end up with a problem much greater than the original.

There is another aspect to the idea and I think it underscores artie's suggestion. One of the things I dislike about other sites is that there is so much absolute drivel out there. Many people seem to want to post anything at all, just to appear knowledgeable, or just to be heard.

Whether or not the decision at FTM is to display more or less initial information is of no consequence to me personally. When I want to see more I just change the viewing parameter myself.

However, a new person to FTM, able immediately to read reasonable discourse rather than nonsense, might think this is a good place to visit.


ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Default Display Options
dkmarsh #28024 01/28/14 11:54 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Specious?

Great word! (Perhaps you'll even use it correctly next time.)

For the benefit, then, of those who can't relate to this thread's topic other than as it relates to their own experience, I'm suggesting that FTM stop hiding its body of knowledge.

Everyone who enters FTM through its front-door home page (There is one, you know.), and at least a percentage of those who enter through back-door search results, is going to look at at least one forum index, and, as things stand now, that index is going to be either sparsely populated or empty, not because of a lack of applicable threads, but because of a lack of recent ones.

FTM is not a late-breaking news site, and its body of facts and fixes does not go stale simply because of the passage of time; a 60 day old post is as likely to solve somebody's problem today - and make FTM look good in the process - as it was on the day it was posted!

And in the FTM context, an alluring thread title is far more compelling than an old date is off-putting (if even noticed).

We've bemoaned FTM's failure to do the business we'd so dearly love it to do; is it wise to pass up an(y) opportunity to (virtually effortlessly) change that?


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Default Display Options
artie505 #28029 01/29/14 01:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 3
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 3


Originally Posted By: New Oxford American Dictionary
spe•cious |ˈspēSHəs|
adjective
superficially plausible, but actually wrong: a specious argument.

That is exactly what I meant.

FWIW, I just conducted a rough survey of activity among Guests in Who's Online. As always, the vast majority of these were Reading a post. Of the sixteen such threads I was able to load before the page refreshed, twelve were older than six months. I didn't have a chance to determine the referrer for these sixteen threads, but in a subsequent go-round with Who's Online, every single Guest (of perhaps two dozen) whose online status was Reading a post had been referred to that post from Google. (Interestingly, roughly half of those were from other nationality's Googles, with the UK and Canada leading the list and Germany also appearing multiple times.)

These observations support my contention that the vast majority of FTM non-member traffic comes from folks researching specific questions via Google search. Yes, some of those then look for other posts in (presumably) the same forum—7 out of 231 Guests were Viewing a list of posts—and some look at the Main Index—16 of 231 were Viewing a list of forums, although 7 of those occurred in a clump, intermixed with Registering a new user, which all shared the same first three parts of the IP address, making it clear that these were all part of an automated spam effort.

I certainly won't insist that none of those who explore FTM a little more deeply after the initial exposure decide to join (or not to join) on the basis of their perception, derived from the number of threads displayed in forum indexes, of the scope of the site's knowledge base; I just think it's likely to be quite a rare occurrence.

As I outlined before, my belief is that the overwhelming majority of people come here looking for very specific information as a result of a Google search. Those who don't find the information they're looking for move on to the next likely-sounding search result. Those who do find what they're looking for already have positive feedback for their visit that far exceeds the visual impact of a list of posts.

That said, unlike grelber I have no objection to the default time range being lengthened to the maximum since, as I said earlier, I normally look at neither the main index nor the individual forum indexes.



dkmarsh—member, FineTunedMac Co-op Board of Directors
Re: Default Display Options
dkmarsh #28085 02/02/14 08:11 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Your own post argues against "specious" being a correct description of my argument!

I've never attempted to estimate a percentage of viewers who may either benefit from expanded forum indices or simply find them useful, merely argued that there is such a percentage, and your post supports my argument...

Originally Posted By: dkmarsh
"Of the sixteen such threads I was able to load before the page refreshed, twelve were older than six months."

A coupl'a questions about visitors and referrers:

1. Can you tell with the tools at your disposal to precisely which threads visitors were referred, or can you tell no more than that they were referred by a search engine, i.e. do you know for a fact that the posts they were viewing during the moments of time in your snapshots are the specific posts to which they were referred, rather than secondary, tertiary, etc, views?

2. Can you tell the origin of viewers looking at lists of posts or the main index?

The answers to those questions will give us a better perspective on your post.


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire

Moderated by  alternaut, cyn, dkmarsh 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.042s Queries: 62 (0.029s) Memory: 0.7010 MB (Peak: 0.8610 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 11:29:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS