An open community 
of Macintosh users,
for Macintosh users.

FineTunedMac Dashboard widget now available! Download Here

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Tuning Up and Parallels
#22 08/05/09 12:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
ryck Online OP
OP Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
My daughter uses an older MacBook (1.83 GHz) with OS 10.5.6 and Parallels to run Windows applications that she needs to interface with the systems at her company. She has never defragged the drive or used any ‘tune up’ software like TechTools.

If she does, are there any special concerns related to the fact that she uses Parallels?

She backs up using Time Machine but it worries me a bit that she isn’t doing any crash avoidance.

ryck


ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
ryck #33 08/05/09 01:12 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
I have a client using 4 Macs with Parallels/WinXP. None have found any uses for Windows specific third party utilities. They simply maintain there Macs with the usual common Mac third party utilities.


- alec -
______________________________________________________
24" iMac C2D 2.4 GHz, 20" iMac G5 1.8 GHz, 14" iBook 1.33 GHz
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
ryck #37 08/05/09 01:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Originally Posted By: ryck
My daughter uses an older MacBook (1.83 GHz) with OS 10.5.6 and Parallels to run Windows applications that she needs to interface with the systems at her company. She has never defragged the drive or used any ‘tune up’ software like TechTools.

While programs like TechTool and DiskWarrior are certainly useful maintenance tools, I haven't found defragging the hard drive to be all that necessary on current Mac systems. Certainly not like it is in say, Windows XP.

Quote:
If she does, are there any special concerns related to the fact that she uses Parallels?

Not really, other than the fact that the Windows side needs to be protected the same way a real PC running Windows would. That could include defragging within Windows (Parallels) periodically. Be sure to have antivirus software running on it and take any precautions you would with a normal PC, especially if she uses it to access the Internet.

Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
ryck #67 08/05/09 06:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Since Parallels creates a virtual hard drive for Windows that's stored inside a file, the Windows "hard drive" is just an ordinary file from the Mac's perspective. It can be backed up kist like any other file, and if something happens on the Windows side (such as a virus infection) it can be restored just like any other file.

It's my understanding that Windows defragging utilities don't actually defrag the virtual hard disk at all. They run, but since they're working inside a container file, they don't actually move anything around.

The advice to run antivirus software on the Windows side is good; it's just as prone to virus infection as a 'real' Windows PC.


Photo gallery, all about me, and more: www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
ryck #135 08/05/09 02:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 16
Moderator
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 16
I have defragged my hard drive several times and it has never had any ill effect on my Parallels virtual machine.


If we knew what it was we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?

— Albert Einstein
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
tacit #219 08/05/09 06:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Quote:

It's my understanding that Windows defragging utilities don't actually defrag the virtual hard disk at all. They run, but since they're working inside a container file, they don't actually move anything around.


Not entirely the case. Just like the OS on a physical disk takes longer to seek for fragmented files, it still takes longer to seek fragmented files within a virtual disk (which resides on a large portion of a physical disk). However, in many cases there is no truly-noticeable difference. I would expect that to be the case with most Windows VM on Mac users, who tend to use their Windows installations for very specific tasks. However, in general with heavily used VMs, most experts recommend defragging virtual disks for performance optimization (although clearly physical disks benefit much greater). The benefits in a server environment, for example, can be measurable. Anyhow, I'd agree that most Parallels users prob needn't bother.


Keeper of the Magic Nickel
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
donikatz #231 08/05/09 08:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
I run the Parallels Compressor once or twice a month. I believe it does defrag the VM drive file prior to doing the compression. At least it says that it does.


---

The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth. - Niels Bohr
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
crarko #232 08/05/09 09:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Nifty. Not being a Parallels user myself, had no idea they had that feature built in.


Keeper of the Magic Nickel
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
donikatz #418 08/07/09 04:28 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: donikatz
Not entirely the case. Just like the OS on a physical disk takes longer to seek for fragmented files, it still takes longer to seek fragmented files within a virtual disk (which resides on a large portion of a physical disk).


That's true, but I don't think the Windows defragger actually moves any files or directory entries within the virtual container file. It's my understanding that the Parallels hypervisor abstracts file I/O from Windows to such an extent that when the Windows defragger attempts to move a file, the Parallels hypervisor merely discards those commands without changing anything inside the container. I might be wrong about that, but I seem to recall reading that that's the case--if you look at the container file before and after running a Windows defrag program, the container file hasn't changed.


Photo gallery, all about me, and more: www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
tacit #479 08/07/09 02:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Interesting, because that's not the case with VMware, so I'd just assumed Parallels was the same. With VMware, while the actual VMDK file is contiguous, data within the container is certainly not. Therefore defrag is still applicable. If you defrag a VMware VM, you'll see the container changes a lot. This is very noticeable with an incremental or differential backup, for example.

A cursory glance at the Parallels.com forums shows some threads recommending defrag, but I haven't dug deep enough there to see if they're just doing it because they think they should vs they really should. I did find a thread in MFIF where JMB says he didn't see defrag do anything in Parallels.


Keeper of the Magic Nickel
Re: Tuning Up and Parallels
ryck #548 08/07/09 10:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
since the parallels disk image is much the same as a physical hard drive in how it's used, defragmenting within Windows still has the same value as it did with physical disc.


I work for the Department of Redundancy Department

Moderated by  joemikeb, MacManiac 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 36 (0.018s) Memory: 0.6226 MB (Peak: 0.7185 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 10:29:47 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS