In this case, being Unique is NOT a good thing as it means you are uniquely identifiable. As to the variance, the devil is in the details. To quote the report on my browser…
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 255,805 tested in the past 45 days.
which would indicate uniqueness could change from minute to minute or even second to second depending on the other browsers tested.
Note: because tracking techniques are complex, subtle, and constantly evolving, Cover Your Tracks does not measure all forms of tracking and protection.
So there are likely other untested factors that could make you more unique. If you want to be less unique then download every different browser you can find and randomly rotate the one you use each time you go to a different web site and connect to the internet through a VPN and change the VPN connection every few minutes. You may still have some unique characteristic but it would be harder to pinpoint.
Frankly I am more interested in...
Our tests indicate that you have strong protection against Web tracking, though your software isn’t checking for Do Not Track policies.
FOOTNOTE: I just tested the most secure browser and connection I know,
TOR using onion routing and it reported…
Our tests indicate that you have strong protection against Web tracking.
Blocking tracking ads? Yes
Blocking invisible trackers? Yes
Protecting you from fingerprinting? Your browser has a non-unique fingerprint
{Emphasis Mine}
Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 3657.77 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.
…and that was at TOR's
Safer setting and not its Safest. (The safest setting only works for static sites with basic services.)