Just because you do not find a "feature" of benefit does not mean many others, perhaps even the majority, do not.
I will admit that there will be some, such as yourself, who find the geotags beneficial. However, given the millions and millions of smartphones in use, and the fact that so many are simply sending quick shots back and forth, I can't see where it's possible that the "majority" have use for geotags.
Despite what it says under my avatar, "I'm from Missouri" on that one.
Frankly I think the only reason geotags are not more widely used is because most people are unaware of them.
This supports my contention. If the smartphone manufacturers thought this was of benefit to the majority, they'd say so.....and they'd be providing instructions about how to make use of them. My guess is that it'd even be a selling feature in advertising.
....most people are unaware of them.
And, consequently, millions of people are also unaware of the downside and are therefore vulnerable. It seems to me that it would be better if the manufacturers said, for people like you who want the feature, "Your smartphone is capable of......and here's how to enable the function".
The person who would use this function is likely also the kind of person who would have the skills to turn it
on off safely. However, I suggest the average user is going to find that task - under present conditions - too daunting even to try.
I am sure others can come up with ways they use geotags but these two are off the top of my head.
I'm sure we can hear about some other uses. However, I wonder if we'll hear about something that the millions and millions of average users (the majority) are doing with geotags.
ryck