An open community 
of Macintosh users,
for Macintosh users.

FineTunedMac Dashboard widget now available! Download Here

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Savants
#6955 12/24/09 03:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
ryck Offline OP
OP Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
I've always been astounded when seeing television reports showing some of the things that savants are capable of doing. Mostly the reports would be about a savant with an amazing ability in a specific area - music or math or....

I had never heard the term "Megasavant" until reading about the death of Kim Peek this past week. When I read about a few of his capabilities I have to say that "astounded" is an inadequate word.

I certainly don't know anything about neurology or the related sciences but I do wonder what this means about human brains. Clearly they are capable of tasks beyond our imaginations but the capabilities only seem to be tapped when the brain is damaged (if that's the appropriate term).

ryck

Last edited by ryck; 12/24/09 03:09 PM.

ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Savants
ryck #6975 12/25/09 05:39 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 1
There's a common myth that the human brain only uses 20% (or 10% or some other number, depending on who's repeating it) of its capacity.

That's actually not true at all; we use our entire brains, and perform some pretty amazing things with them. A normal human being is capable of an incredible range of tasks--parsing, understanding, and producing language, reading and responding to subtle and extremely complex social cues, integrating real-time information about our environment into a constantly evolving physical, emotional, and social map; solving highly abstract problems; generating abstractions from concrete information; correlating information from a wide variety of different sources...the only thing that prevents people from walking around in a constant state of awe at what we do every single day is the fact that almost all of us do it all the time.

Savants have very high degrees of skill in a tiny area of expertise, but it comes at the price of a single-minded focus that renders them largely incapable of the flexibility that most of the rest of us are capable of. The result may look impressive, and in its own way I suppose it is...but I'm honestly far more impressed by the flexibility, adaptability, and abstract reasoning process of an ordinary human being.

In the 1960s, computer scientists were convinced that true "strong" artificial intelligence was right around the corner. One after another, cognitive tasks that we had always assumed required intelligence were falling; we learned how to make computers play chess, write in calligraphy, diagnose diseases, predict the interactions of drugs, model complex self-organizing systems...all with a proficiency much greater than humans. (They don't even do man-machine chess tournaments any more; even a PC can defeat any human player, including a human grandmaster.)

But what we've discovered is that mastery of a particular cognitive task is easy; it's flexibility that's hard. We don't all walk around with savant-level capabilities for the very simple reason that so much of our cognitive horsepower is being consumed simply by being able to respond to the environment as flexibly as we do. THAT is the amazing stuff.


Photo gallery, all about me, and more: www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
Re: Savants
ryck #6978 12/25/09 09:14 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
Online

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 15
> Clearly they are capable of tasks beyond our imaginations but the capabilities only seem to be tapped when the brain is damaged (if that's the appropriate term).

A CPA with whom I used to work can spit out the product of two four digit numbers before mere mortals can even focus on them, and another CPA I knew had eidetic memory; neither displayed any signs of "brain damage" unless "quirkiness" falls into that category.


The new Great Equalizer is the SEND button.

In Memory of Harv: Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
Re: Savants
tacit #6981 12/25/09 01:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
ryck Offline OP
OP Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Originally Posted By: tacit
We don't all walk around with savant-level capabilities for the very simple reason that so much of our cognitive horsepower is being consumed simply by being able to respond to the environment as flexibly as we do. THAT is the amazing stuff.


I'm with you in being in complete amazement of the human brain's capabilities.

In my post I used the word "damaged' but having read a little bit it seems that word was quite wrong. i.e. 'damaged' should apply to a perfectly good brain hurt in a car accident whereas savants' brains seem to have been 'wired differently'.

If my assumption is correct, would "different wiring" then account for the way so many brains are so different? We look around us and see people who are extremely bright while others are just thick. Some are very talented musicians while others are tone-deaf. Picasso was a genius in art and Einstein was a genius in math, but I'm pretty sure that neither could do what the other was capable of. Et cetera.

Could these (or artie505's examples, for that matter) be greater or lesser degrees of what you call the savant's "single-minded focus"?

ryck


ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C
Re: Savants
ryck #7126 12/30/09 08:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 4
The December 2005 article on Kim Peek has been made available (reposted) by the Scientific American in light of his death: Inside the Mind of a Savant, accompanied by a brief obituary, A window on savant syndrome closes with the death of Kim Peek.

Re: Savants
grelber #7194 01/01/10 05:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
ryck Offline OP
OP Offline

Joined: Aug 2009
Likes: 14
Thanks for the links. Inside the Mind of A Savant is particularly interesting.

ryck


ryck

"What Were Once Vices Are Now Habits" The Doobie Brothers

iMac (Retina 5K, 27", 2020), 3.8 GHz 8 Core Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 2667 MHz DDR4
OS Ventura 13.6.3
Canon Pixma TR 8520 Printer
Epson Perfection V500 Photo Scanner c/w VueScan software
TM on 1TB LaCie USB-C

Moderated by  alternaut, cyn 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.556s Queries: 27 (0.011s) Memory: 0.5965 MB (Peak: 0.6708 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 04:48:54 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS